When an author trims a health post's disclaimer, fold the warning into a limits sentence instead of dropping it

The author of an allergy-candy data post cut both 'This is a demo, not a safety tool' and the closing 'Always read the package label' as unnecessary endings. Rather than re-adding a standalone disclaimer they'd already rejected, say once that the post now has no safety caveat, then offer one clause on the existing limitations sentence. They accepted: '..., the 2017 data is old, and 62 candies do not yet have enough current labels to compare, so be sure to always read the package label.' It reads as a consequence of the limits, not boilerplate.